[cAos-devel] System Imager
Nick R
nick at ngr78.co.uk
Tue Feb 27 13:31:00 GMT 2007
Maybe this will help: http://www.ntfs.com/partition-deleted.htm
Nick
On 27/02/07, Martyn <martyn at theendofhistether.org.uk> wrote:
>
> Michael Jennings wrote:
> > I have ISO's which have done successful installs under qemu, but I'm
> > holding off on calling them "2.3" until I can put the 2.6.20.x kernel
> > on there.
> >
> And let's try and get some clarification on why greg doesn't trust
> /proc/partitions.
>
> Greg: in scan_partitions of cinch, you're using fdisk to clarify if a
> partition is real by looking for "no valid".... unfortunately if there
> has been an extended partition at the block where the partition starts,
> there is a valid partition table. Also on some winXP installs, there
> seems to be a backup of the partition table in the first block of the
> NTFS partition, so to install on these, I have had to dd if=/dev/zero
> of=/dev/hda1....
>
> That's not really a sensible way to get cinch to see the partitions to
> install to. Also, my preference is not to create extended partitions
> unless they're needed, so for the base 4-partition scheme for cAos-2, I
> would prefer to see hda1-4 not hda1-3 and 5!
> > I guess I could post them as pre-release ISO's if folks want to test
> > them, though...
> >
> Well, I'm not so desperate, but maybe others are :-)
> > Michael
> >
> --
> Martyn (Joran)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cAos-devel mailing list
> cAos-devel at caoslinux.org
> http://lists.caosity.org/mailman/listinfo/caos-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.caosity.org/pipermail/caos-devel/attachments/20070227/6ba0d7c7/attachment.html
More information about the cAos-devel
mailing list